Bitcoin and Anarchy Have No Ruler Rules – Bitcoin Magazine
This is an excerpt from the “Bitcoin Magazine Podcast” hosted by P and Q. In this episode, Ben de Waal joins us to talk about how a Bitcoin-based mindset can grow a political system into a consensus-based government. .
Watch this episode on YouTube or Rumble
Listen to the episode here:
Q: I’d like to understand a bit more about how you feel anarchy fits into this equation. And it comes to mind that he’s sending whoever he wants to jail. middle of the ice. That, to me, is how anarchy looks and feels.
P: Do you support Scarecrow? That’s what Q is asking.
Ben de Waal: No.
Q: Are you a Scarecrow or a Joker?
De Waal: Maybe a little too much joker, but neither.
So anarchy is rule without rulers, and the first part of it is still very important. Anarchy has rules. There is no ruler to set those rules. It’s about people getting together and deciding together what the rules should be. So in many ways, the Bitcoin consensus algorithm is a good example of anarchy. No one says this is the rule. There are no rulers to go down and set them. We decide them by consensus.
I think it has yet to be shown whether pure anarchy works in the real world. It has been tried several times. In the early 1900s Spain, especially Catalonia, was in anarchy. Then there are some small examples in small autonomous regions around the world.
There have always been attempts at anarchy. I don’t know if pure anarchy will survive long term, but I hope it does. I tend to see anarchy as a goal to work on rather than something to implement over time. Basically, every time you remove unnecessary rulers from the system, the system becomes more chaotic, and that’s a good thing.
I would like to build an anarchic system within the current system and basically do away with the current system. In fact, there is a good term for socialism called national decay. In essence, the state itself only withers when it becomes useless. Bitcoin is a good example.
As Bitcoin grows and becomes stronger, central banks will decline, become irrelevant, irrelevant, and useless. No one cares whether they exist or not, and they eventually disappear on their own. Other chaotic systems potentially supported by Bitcoin-powered economic systems can be used to deplete other aspects of the nation. I want to see how far I can go.
Q: So, if my explanation is correct, we don’t necessarily want total anarchy forever. Rather, it hoped to give the action of an anarchic uprising in an instant, almost instantaneously, a runway for recreating and fixing what had been broken by the leader or those who were previously in power. I’m here.
De Waal: Yes, but potentially by removing that power entirely, it really depends on what happens. What Bitcoin did. I’m not saying what the future should look like.
i don’t have all the answers. I don’t know what the perfect future looks like. I know what is perceived as wrong in today’s society. Too many authoritarians say it should be this way. So stop being an authoritarian who says this is how every aspect of society should be. It’s not just governments, states and organizations. That’s the company. Get rid of the authoritarians and see how far you can go.
Bitcoin and Anarchy Have No Ruler Rules – Bitcoin Magazine
Source link Bitcoin and Anarchy Have No Ruler Rules – Bitcoin Magazine
