Airways push their case for looser compensation guidelines amid deliberate overhaul

Aviation firms are making the pitch to Ottawa for looser guidelines round buyer compensation forward of an overhaul to passenger rights tips, at the same time as client advocates say a few of the airways’ arguments are an overreach.

In submissions and conferences, trade teams warned Canada’s transport regulator that sweeping reforms introduced earlier this yr will put travellers’ security in danger and drain carriers of money after a financially devastating COVID-19 pandemic.

The federal laws seems to eradicate a loophole by way of which airways have denied prospects compensation for flight delays or cancellations once they had been required for security functions — an exemption the sector needs restored so pilots do not feel pressured to decide on between flying faulty planes and costing their employer cash.

“We wish our pilots to be totally free from any monetary consideration once they take a safety-related choice,” WestJet CEO Alexis von Hoensbroech mentioned in a video chat from Ottawa this week, the place he was assembly with federal ministers on the reforms. The Air Line Pilots Affiliation raised related considerations in a submission to the Canadian Transportation Company.

“Regulation ought to by no means be punitive for security choices,” he mentioned.

Within the European Union, nevertheless, the place guidelines and precedents similar to the approaching passenger rights constitution are in place, flight security stays uncompromised, advocates say.

“Did it make it much less protected to fly in Europe? I do not suppose so,” mentioned Sylvie De Bellefeuille, a lawyer with the advocacy group Possibility consommateurs.

The EU code got here into drive almost 20 years in the past, shored up by courtroom rulings that require compensation even for journey disruptions brought on by security considerations, comparable to mechanical points. No main accidents involving EU-registered planes have occurred in industrial aviation since 2015.

“It lays fairly in poor health within the mouth of the trade to say that in case you … take away that excuse then we’ll due to this fact fly unsafe planes,” mentioned John Lawford, government director of the Public Curiosity Advocacy Centre.

“I am shocked that they’d have the chutzpah to say that.”

The primary section of reforms comes into impact on Saturday, kicking off a extra streamlined complaints course of that presently creaks underneath the load of greater than 57,000 complaints.

That backlog has continued to mount regardless of a slowdown in filings, which may take as much as two years for the regulator to course of. The brand new system will likely be managed by “criticism decision officers” — 40 have been employed, with 60 extra anticipated to be educated over the subsequent yr, in accordance with the company.

Among the many provisions slated to kick in subsequent yr are charges imposed on airways by the regulator to get well some or the entire price of dealing with these complaints. If a passenger recordsdata one on account of a flight disruption or denial of boarding, the reformed guidelines put the onus on the airline to show the transfer was for causes outdoors its management, comparable to dangerous climate.

On prime of those further bills, airways make the case that regional routes could be pricier for patrons — or just cancelled outright — as slim revenue margins would tip into purple ink amid increased prices from complaints and costs.

“That would doubtlessly have an effect on regional connectivity and accessibility for routes which may not be as worthwhile,” mentioned Jeff Morrison, who heads the Nationwide Airways Council, which represents airways together with Air Canada and WestJet. “There’s all the time a trade-off.”

The common revenue for giant carriers quantities to lower than $10 per passenger, mentioned WestJet’s CEO.

“If we’ve to compensate the passengers, it is hundreds,” von Hoensbroech mentioned, noting that the common one-way ticket value hovers round $200. “You want many, many flights to get well.”

Lawford, in addition to Air Passenger Rights president Gabor Lukacs, deemed the airways’ warnings round routes to smaller or far-flung communities as tantamount to “blackmail.”

“If you happen to’re slicing regional routes, we will open the entire nation for extra competitors,” Lukacs mentioned, framing the potential scale-back as a possibility for different airways.

He additionally advised subsidies to help regional journeys, whose fares have shot up over the previous 4 years, at the same time as ticket costs on busier routes fell.

Von Hoensbroech additionally mentioned accountability for flight disruptions — together with the associated fee burden — have to be shared throughout the trade, not borne by airways alone.

The Canadian Transportation Company is presently engaged on a draft of the brand new Air Passenger Safety Rules, anticipated to be printed this yr earlier than the brand new constitution is carried out in 2024.

WATCH | Airline passengers in Canada are annoyed by delays and the criticism course of: