Investigation of Trump documents: Court suspends Mar-a-Lago record

Article content

WASHINGTON — Denying outright Donald Trump’s legal allegations, a federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled the Justice Department’s use of classified records seized from the former president’s Florida property as part of an ongoing criminal investigation. Allowed to restart.

advertising 2

Article content

The three-judge ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit was a resounding win for the Justice Department, paving the way for investigators to continue to scrutinize the documents as they consider whether to criminalize their retention. was opened. Top secret record at Mar-a-Lago after Trump left the White House. By removing the hold on core parts of the Justice Department’s investigation, the court removed an obstacle that could have delayed the investigation for weeks, if not months.

Article content

The appeals court also noted that Trump did not provide evidence that he had declassified the classified records, noting that the nearly 100 documents marked as classified records were of “personal interest or need.” I denied the possibility of having sex. It was seized when the FBI searched his Palm Beach property on August 8.

advertising 3

Article content

The government claimed that the investigation was hampered and national security concerns dispelled, but an order from U.S. District Court Judge Eileen Cannon temporarily prevented investigators from continuing to use the documents in investigations. Trump’s nominee Cannon said the suspension would remain pending another review by an independent arbitrator she appointed when asked by Trump’s team to review the record. was

The Appeals Committee concurred with the Department of Justice’s concerns.

“It is self-evident that the public has a keen interest in ensuring that the storage of classified records does not cause ‘very serious harm to national security,'” they wrote. “To confirm that, you’d have to look at the documentation, determine who accessed it and when, and determine what (if any) source or method was compromised.”

Advertising 4

Article content

Sorry, this video could not be loaded.

An injunction that delays or impedes a criminal investigation, they write, “uses classified material at risk of causing real and serious harm to the United States and its people.”

Two of the three judges who delivered Wednesday’s ruling, Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher, were named by Trump to the 11th Circuit. Justice Robin Rosenbaum was nominated by former President Barack Obama.

A lawyer for Trump did not return an email seeking comment on whether to appeal the ruling.The Justice Department did not immediately comment.

The FBI seized nearly 11,000 documents, including about 100 classification marks, during a court-sanctioned Palm Beach club raid last month. A criminal investigation has been launched into whether the records were mishandled or compromised, but it’s not clear if Trump or anyone else will be prosecuted.

Advertising 5

Article content

On September 5, Canon will appoint an independent arbitrator or special master to independently review these records and determine any that may be subject to claims of attorney and client privilege or enforcement privilege. Separated and the materials must be returned to Trump. Raymond Deary, the former Chief Justice of the Brooklyn-based federal court, was appointed to the role and held his first meeting with attorneys from both sides on Tuesday.

The DOJ has argued that no special master review of classified documents is required. Since Trump has no plausible basis for exercising executive privilege over the documents and does not involve interactions between Trump and his attorneys, the records should be covered under attorney-client privilege. He said he couldn’t do it either.

Advertising 6

Article content

It also challenged Cannon’s order requiring Dearie and Trump’s lawyers to provide access to classified materials. The court on Wednesday backed the Justice Department, saying, “The court should order review of such material only in the most extraordinary circumstances. The record does not permit the conclusion that this is the case.”

Trump’s attorneys argued that an independent review of the records was essential given the unprecedented nature of the investigation. It says it has not proved it, but has not gone as far as to claim that the records were previously declassified, as Trump has repeatedly claimed.

advertising 7

Article content

Trump’s team resisted providing Dearie with information to support the idea that the records may have been declassified this week, suggesting the issue could become part of their defense if indicted. I suggested something.

But the Court of Appeals appeared to scoff at the claim.

“Plaintiff has suggested that he may have declassified these documents when he was president. However, the records do not contain evidence that any of these records were declassified. “In any event, at least for these purposes, the declassification argument is dangerous, because declassification of official documents alters their Because I don’t want to make it a thing.”

— Colvin reported from New York.

    advertising 1


Postmedia is committed to maintaining an active yet respectful forum for discussion and encourages all readers to share their opinions on our articles. It may take up to an hour to moderate your comments before they appear on the site. Please keep your comments relevant and respectful. You have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email when you receive a reply to a comment, when a comment thread you are following is updated, or when someone is following your comment. For more information and details on how to adjust your email preferences, please see our Community Guidelines.

Investigation of Trump documents: Court suspends Mar-a-Lago record

Source link Investigation of Trump documents: Court suspends Mar-a-Lago record

Related Articles

Back to top button