On a sunny August 2018 evening, Paul Manzon was driving down the Brampton highway. He turned 50 in a shiny blue powered-up Corvette, showing off his date, oblivious to the safety of everyone around him.
He was going 163km/h in the 80km/h zone five seconds before he hit the left-turning KIA SUV.
A horrific crash killed driver Allison Jones, 47, and her son Miles, 7. Her daughter’s friend, Giulia Riccobene, 12Daughter Lily was also seriously injured Manzonpassenger Rhonda Gary.
Was it a split-second “bad decision” made by an otherwise good person who should be sentenced to just four years in prison? The taking of three innocent lives by a dangerous driver you should know?
Superior Court Judge Nancy Denison convicted the Caledon man on three counts in January. dangerous Driving Death and Two Physical Causes harmrejects the argument that it was a temporary error of judgment.
“No Appropriate Suppose you are driving at 163 km/h on a four-lane motorway near an intersection with cars.” she said.
But the judge acquitted Manzon With five counts of criminal negligence, his driving was subject to the higher standards of negligence.naughty or reckless” ignore for safety Others.
In Friday’s filing of the final judgment, Prosecutor Shajin Karim asked Denison to sentence Manzon to 10 to 12 years in prison and a five-year driving ban for tearing apart two families and ravaging their community. Many were in tears, and 55 more were brought to court.
“Their family was forever changed,” said the crown. “They are serving life sentences.”
Manzon was no youthful first offender, she reminded the court. He was 45 at the time and had a dated criminal record, including his two convictions for driving while disabled.
“Driving is a privilege,” Karim said. “Mr. Manzon has been convicted of violating that privilege twice in the past. This is the third time he’s been in court.”
His own passenger had to repeatedly tell him to slow down, she said.
Manzon’s attorney, Craig Bottomley, argued that the range proposed by the royal family was too strict.
“You can’t sentence Mr. Manzon to something like DUI,” he said.
No sentence can repair the “absolutely tragic loss” of a mother and two children, but a four-year prison term with a 10-year driving ban would be appropriate in this case, he said.
Manzon will always have a difficult time due to health issues such as asthma, sleep apnea and pre-crash PTSD, his lawyers noted.
Bottomley quoted extensively from Manzon’s guilt-ridden letter to the court.
“There have been many days where I wish I had died instead of mother and child,” he wrote. ”
“My deepest condolences to the bereaved families who lost loved ones in this accident. I know there is nothing I can do or say to make things right,” he continued. Words cannot express the guilt and remorse I feel for the events of August 4th that took the lives of three people and devastated two families.”
His Lawyers Claimed His Client Has Good Rehabilitation Prospects: Manzon Active in community philanthropy and mental health causes for children, caring for an elderly father.
“You’re making the first ever sentence to hold a human being in custody,” argued Bottomley.You are judging a good person who made a terrible decision in a very short moment. ”
But it wasn’t short-lived — witnesses saw him speeding up before the fatal crash.
And it’s only four years that caused three senseless and preventable deaths? How is that enough?
Dennison is expected to make judgment in November.
Defense seeks four years in prison for driver who killed mother and two children
Source link Defense seeks four years in prison for driver who killed mother and two children