Controversial plan to turn Sixplex into parking lot returns to commission

The city’s Planning Commission heard in July that closing the parking proposal would mean that a planned 300-unit apartment building on a nearby property would also not go ahead.

Article content

Developers Glenview and Taggart will report to the Ottawa City Planning Commission on Thursday about their thoughts on their proposal to replace a six-unit apartment building in the city center with an office parking lot. .

advertising 2

Article content

This was a proposal that members of the planning committee were not eager to support when the proposal was submitted in July, and it received backlash from the community.

Article content

Despite encouraging developers to be more creative in their approach to setting up alternate parking lots for tenants in the Glenview office building, it now appears the commission will have to vote on the plan. Those tenants will lose their place in the proposed 300-unit multifamily that the developer wants to build on the street.

In a joint statement provided to the newspaper on Tuesday, the developers said:We look forward to our project partners reviewing and presenting their considered options to the planning committee. We will also amend the zoning of the site to replace a new adjacent parking lot for tenants in the office building at 190 O’Connor Street.

advertising 3

Article content

They pointed out that the building at 142 Nepean is 70 years old. “Poor working condition requiring major repair and maintenance”

Glenview told the Planning Commission in July that closing the parking proposal would mean that plans for a 300-unit apartment complex at nearby 108 Nepean St. would also not go ahead.

“This is not a threat, just a commercial reality that we are dealing with,” he said. Mark Shavinski of Glenview at the time.

Commission members approved the application for 108 Nepeans while deferring a vote on the parking plan until the next meeting. Developers are still being asked to take time to review the revisions prior to the August 31st council review of the files.

In a statement Tuesday, the developer said, “In order to proceed with the development, Glenview is contractually obligated to provide adequate alternative parking for commercial tenants. This will be at 142, 144 and 148 Nepean Streets. It’s considered a parking lot.”

Advertising 4

Article content

Katherine McKechnie, now the area’s alderman and mayoral candidate, challenged the position in a speech Tuesday at a rally hosted by the social justice group ACORN.

Protesters held a rally outside the Sixplex at 142 Nepean St. and were suggested to relocate to secure parking.
Protesters held a rally outside the Sixplex at 142 Nepean St. and were suggested to relocate to secure parking. Photo by Jean Rebaque /post media

“They don’t need[the spot]in the parking lot…there are a lot of flat parking lots downtown,” McKenney says. “What we are being asked to do on Thursday is say yes to demolishing an affordable 6-unit market rental inhabited by people for parking. “

Centertown Community Association also said:I strongly oppose the proposal.”

The developer, in a memorandum of understanding with city officials, will include $15,000 in toll transfers to similar-size units at nearby Wentworth Plaza or Imperial Apartments for those still living at 142 Nepean Street. We proposed a transfer agreement. Rent has been discounted for five years to match what was paid at 142 Nepean, and the 25 “affordable” planned for the new Glenview-Taggart development, provided the tenants do not move again until the building is completed. He has access to one of the ”units”.

Advertising 5

Article content

At this time, only 3 units of the 6 plexes are occupied, according to a current tenant who does not want to be named for family reasons.

What they left behind, and which three families still live in, is an affordable market unit that needs to be maintained, McKenney told reporters after the ACORN rally on Tuesday.

Even if the Commission and Council deny the developer the necessary permits to implement the parking plan, it is no guarantee that future redevelopment of the dilapidated apartment building at 142 Nepean Street will be prevented.

“The 142 is nearing the end of its life,” Planning Commission co-chair Scott Moffat said at a committee meeting in July. “At some point, the Council will make a decision that it will have to make about its future. Even if there is a way to suspend it now, that decision is bound to come, and it cannot be avoided.”

Advertising 6

Article content

At the time, Moffat shared the opinion that the site’s “highest and best use” was “not as a parking lot, but as a future residential building.” But that’s not the application we have in front of us today. “

In fact, which committee is being asked to vote at this time, McKechnie said, would remove six units for parking.

“And it sucks. No modern city anywhere I can think of would say yes.”

    advertising 1


Postmedia is committed to maintaining an active yet respectful forum for discussion and encourages all readers to share their opinions on our articles. It may take up to an hour to moderate your comments before they appear on the site. Please keep your comments relevant and respectful. You have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email when you receive a reply to a comment, when a comment thread you are following is updated, or when someone is following your comment. For more information and details on how to adjust your email preferences, please see our Community Guidelines.

Controversial plan to turn Sixplex into parking lot returns to commission

Source link Controversial plan to turn Sixplex into parking lot returns to commission

Related Articles

Back to top button