This article was originally published by The Guardian and is published here as part of a collaboration with Climate Desk.
Internal documents show companies are trying to distance themselves from agreed climate targets, admitting to “gaslighting” the public by claiming to work towards protecting the environment, and further criticizing Criticism in the US for obfuscating the oil industry on the climate crisis is mounting after internal documents showed that activists wanted to infect the climate crisis. bed bugs.
This communication was released as part of a recent congressional hearing in Washington, DC. There, a study into the role of fossil fuels driving the climate crisis produced documents obtained from oil giants ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and his BP.
Sunrise Executive Director Varsini Prakash said: The organization accused Shell of being “a legacy of violence and a disregard for the well-being of communities around the world.”
The revelations are part of the third public hearing held by a House committee for oversight and reform on how the fossil fuel industry sought to thwart efforts to tackle the climate crisis. The Democrats who lead the committee asked oil company executives to testify last year, but they denied misleading the public.
The new documents are “the latest evidence that the oil giants continue to lie about their commitments to help solve the climate crisis, and should never be trusted by policy makers,” according to the Center for Climate Conservation. Director Richard Wiles said.
“If there’s one thing that’s consistent about the climate positions of the big oil and gas companies, it’s that they can’t tell the truth at all,” added Wiles.
Commission co-chair Lo Khanna said the new document was “explosive” and showed a “culture of fierce disrespect” for climate activists. , relying on unproven technology, accounting gimmicks and misleading language to hide reality,” he added. I laugh at the people I try to protect.”
Some of the e-mails and memos contained in the mass of publicly available documents, executives, staff and lobbyists internally contradicted the companies’ public statements that they would act to reduce global warming emissions. It seems to indicate that
Exxon recently announced a profit of $17.9 billion in the three months to June. That’s more than three times as many as in the same period last year, and he’s professed to be “committed” to the Paris Agreement to curb global warming.
Criticism has intensified after a major oil company admitted to “gaslighting” the public over its green ends. #BigOil #Gaslighting #ClimateCrisis #FossilFuel
However, documents released by a Democratic-led House committee include a memo sent by executives to Exxon Chief Executive Officer Darren Woods in August 2019, citing an industry lobby group that exxon is a member of.
Such statements “could create potential commitments to uphold the goals of the Paris Agreement,” the executive warned. Despite being long promoted as a way to reduce emissions, he acknowledged that algae-derived biofuels are still “decades away from the scale we need.”
Shell, on the other hand, has committed to becoming a “net-zero” emissions business by 2050, but the document does not allow employees to Shows private communications in 2020 urging them not to remain public or to remain public as they may lead to a zero) is Shell’s goal or target.” “We have no immediate plans to transition to a net-zero emissions portfolio,” he added.
A Shell tweet posted in 2020 asking others what they could do to reduce emissions sparked a flurry of derision from Twitter users. A company spokesperson criticized the tweets as “gaslighting” and that the public was “not entirely without merit”, writing privately that the tweets were “pretty deaf”. added:
The UK-based oil company, which announced a record $11.5 billion quarterly profit in July, also showered scorn on climate activists, with communications experts at the company emailing in 2019 to criticize the youth-led movement. One Sunrise movement said it wanted ‘bedbugs’. US Climate Group.
Previous releases of internal documents indicated that the oil industry knew of the devastating impacts of climate change, but instead chose to downplay and even publicly deny these findings in order to preserve its business model. was showing
The hearings have been attacked by Republicans as a way to “wage war on America’s energy producers,” with oil companies involved complaining that the documents do not give the full picture of their positions on the climate crisis. .
Exxon supports the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, the spokesperson said, adding, “The selective release of dated emails without context is a strong endorsement of ExxonMobil and its employees’ commitment to and action on climate change. It deliberately attempts to generate a narrative that does not reflect the commitment of Play a leading role in the transition to a net-zero future. ”
A Shell spokesman, meanwhile, said the commission chose to highlight only a handful of the nearly half-million pages it provided for its “extensive efforts” to participate in the energy transition. Stated.
“In that pursuit, we are challenging internal and external debates that indicate Shell’s intention to form partnerships and share the paths it believes are important to becoming a net zero energy business,” he said. .
Anger rises after Big Oil admits to ‘gaslighting’ over environmental goals
Source link Anger rises after Big Oil admits to ‘gaslighting’ over environmental goals