Amber Heard’s lawyer claims that Johnny Depp “demonized” his ex-wife and suppressed evidence in a defamation trial-nationwide.

Amber Heard’s lawyer alleged that the actor had successfully “demonized” Hard and turned the court into a “zoo” in a defamation proceeding between the client and Johnny Depp.

In an exclusive interview with NBC today At the show on Thursday, Elaine Charleson Bredehoft claimed that Depp and his legal team were able to successfully curb the “huge amount of evidence” that would have been hard-helpful in the trial.

On Wednesday, a jury in Fairfax, Virginia, ruled in favor of Depp (58), deciding that Hard (36) had actually suffered three defamations and inflicted US $ 15 million in damages. rice field. This amount was later reduced to $ 10.35 million by the judge.

Depp’s former lawyer and press alleges her domestic violence Pirates of the Caribbean The actor “Abuse Hoax” designed to take advantage of the #MeToo movement.

Depp was not in court when the jury read the verdict. Haad appeared in court with her legal team.

Bredehoft today After receiving the verdict, the first thing Hard said was to show how “sorry” she was.

“One of the first things she said was,” I’m very sorry for all the women there. This is a setback for all the women inside and outside the courtroom. She feels the burden, “Bredehoft said. Said.

Bredehoft also emphasized that Depp had already offered this defamation trial in the United Kingdom in 2020.

Hard’s lawyer argued that Virginia juries were not allowed to notify the British verdict.

For the British trial, Depp and his lawyer have decided to take a different approach in the United States, this time “demonstrating amber and suppressing evidence,” Bredehoft said. The evidence includes medical records from a Hard therapist allegedly detailing patterns of abuse dating back to 2012, and “a significant amount of text” from Depp and his employees admitting abuse to Hard. Was included, Bredehoft said.

Trend story

• Four people killed in shooting at Tulsa Medical Center, shooters killed: police

• A woman attacked by a bison in Yellowstone Park and thrown 10 feet in the air

She claimed that she couldn’t present one of the texts from Depp’s assistant in court, and explained that he cried and apologized when he learned that Depp had “kicked” what he had heard.

“Many things that shouldn’t have been allowed in this court have confused the jury,” Bredehoft added.

She confirmed that Haad would appeal the verdict from this case, adding that “there are some good grounds for it.” She said Hard couldn’t “absolutely” pay a $ 10 million decision.

She also talked about the impact of social media on the trial, as most of the online discourse was strongly opposed to hard.

The seven juries in this trial were not isolated, so Bredehoft seemed convinced that they must have seen the conversation about the trial online.

“There was no way they couldn’t be influenced by it, and it was terrible. It was really, really biased,” she said of the public reaction.

Bredehoft concluded that the trial would send a “horrible message” to survivors of domestic violence in the United States.

“Unless you unplug your phone and take a video of your spouse or your important other person beating you, you’ll be virtually unbelievable,” she said. Said.

The proceedings filed by Depp revolved around what was written by the editorial hardware in December 2018. Washington post He describes himself as a “public figure representing domestic violence.”

His lawyer says Depp’s life and career was devastated by an article that didn’t say his name.

Depp sued Hard for $ 50 million, but she counterclaimed for $ 100 million.

In their verdict, a jury in the Fairfax County Circuit supported Depp, believing he did not abuse Hard. This decision also shows that in the editorial, Depp is “maliciously” defamed or knows the intent of a false allegation.

In a closing statement from Depp’s legal team, one of his lawyers, Camille Vasquez, falsely told the world that he was a victim of domestic violence by Mr. Depp. “.

“It’s a good name for a man to be at stake in this trial,” Basquez said, adding that Depp’s life is also at stake in the trial.

Basquez called Hard “incredibly aggressive, violent and cruel.” She also claimed that Depp had experienced “permanent and aggressive” abuse by his ex-wife.

After the verdict, Basquez appeared outside the courthouse to thank the jury and said the verdict confirmed that “the allegations against Johnny Depp were defamatory and not supported by any evidence.”

“We are … very grateful to the jury for their careful deliberation,” she told reporters.