Amber Heard seeks to revoke verdict in Johnny Depp’s defamation trial-nationwide
Amber Heard’s lawyer asked the judge to dismiss the $ 10.35 million verdict against her in a defamation case filed by her ex-husband Johnny Depp, which was not supported by evidence and was one of the jury trials. By a court who claimed that a person may not have been properly examined.
In a post-trial allegation filed on Friday, Hard’s lawyer “excessive” the jury’s June 1 ruling of $ 10 million in compensatory damages and $ 5 million in punitive damages against Depp. And we call it “undefensive.”
They revoke the verdict and ask Depp to dismiss the proceedings or order a new trial. Immediately after the verdict, the judge reduced compensatory damages to $ 350,000 under the state cap.
Depp sued Hard for defamation in the Fairfax County Circuit Court in December 2018. She described herself in the Washington Post as “a public figure representing domestic violence.” Depp’s lawyer claimed that he had defamed her in the article, even though he did not mention him in her name.
The six-week television trial turned into a scene that provided a window to their dysfunctional marriage. Much of the testimony focused on Hard’s allegations that she was physically and sexually abused by Depp. She heard about more than 12 alleged assaults, including the fighting in Australia that Depp was shooting. Pirates of the Caribbean Sequel — Depp lost his middle finger, and Haad said she had been sexually assaulted in a bottle.
read more:
Johnny Depp’s jury presented the actor’s blatant and disturbing text about Amber Heard
Depp said she had never hit hard and she was an abuser.
Depp had to prove that he had never assaulted Hard, that her editorial had defamed him, and that she had actually written the article maliciously.
In a post-trial allegation, Hard’s legal team did not believe she had been abused at the time Hard’s article was published to discover that Hard was actually malicious. Insisted that Depp had to show.
“Instead, the evidence overwhelmingly supported Mr. Hard that she was a victim of Mr. Depp’s hand abuse,” Hard’s lawyer said in their motion.
read more:
Amber Heard’s lawyer alleges that Johnny Depp “demonized” his ex-wife and suppressed evidence in a defamation trial.
Heard’s lawyer also claimed that one of the jury’s elected jury was born in 1945 in a document submitted to the lawyer prior to the jury trial process. We are asking you to investigate “potentially inappropriate jury services.” She is stated in publicly available information that she was born in 1970.
“This discrepancy raises the question of whether Jury 15 actually received a subpoena as a jury and was properly scrutinized by the court to serve as a jury,” Hard’s lawyer said in a motion. I did.
Depp’s lawyer did not immediately respond to the request for comment.
read more:
Travis Barker shares details of his “life-threatening” hospitalization
The jury also gave Hard $ 2 million in her counterclaim against Depp, who was found to have been defamed by one of Depp’s lawyers.
In a sense, the case was a reenactment of a proceeding filed in the United Kingdom against the British tabloids after Depp was described as a “wife beater.” In that case, the judge ruled in favor of the newspaper in 2020 after discovering that Haad was telling the truth in the explanation of the abuse.
© 2022 The Canadian Press
Amber Heard seeks to revoke verdict in Johnny Depp’s defamation trial-nationwide
Source link Amber Heard seeks to revoke verdict in Johnny Depp’s defamation trial-nationwide
